Skip to content

Completed Stages of Operation Lockstep

Lockdown Strategy Unveiled: Rockefeller's Plan - Phase 1

Completed Phases of Operation Lockstep
Completed Phases of Operation Lockstep

Completed Stages of Operation Lockstep

In the realm of pandemic discussions, a strategic plan known as the "Rockefeller Playbook: Operation Lockstep" has gained significant attention. This purported blueprint outlines a coordinated global response to a pandemic, emphasising authoritarian control measures such as lockdowns, surveillance, and restrictions on freedoms.

The scenario, described in some sources as a pre-planned strategy for societal control during a health crisis, is primarily found in alternative or conspiracy-leaning narratives rather than official public health policy documents. It is important to clarify that mainstream sources and public health authorities do not recognise an official "Rockefeller Playbook: Operation Lockstep" as a genuine, actionable plan.

Instead, the term originates from a 2010 Rockefeller Foundation scenario planning report titled "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development." This report mapped possible futures, including a pandemic involving coordinated or authoritarian responses. The term "Operation Lockstep" has been popularised in various alternative media or conspiracy contexts, often detached from the original report's intent of scenario study rather than enforcement plan.

The scenario envisions a top-down, strict approach to a pandemic, involving nationwide lockdowns and quarantines, heavy surveillance and control of citizens' movements, centralised decision-making by government and international health authorities, and suppression of dissent or opposition to mandated health measures.

As the COVID-19 pandemic unfolded, discussions about Operation Lockstep resurfaced, sometimes framed in conspiratorial terms that claim prior planning of draconian state control measures disguised as public health interventions. However, it is crucial to approach such claims with a critical eye, considering the lack of concrete evidence supporting these assertions.

The alleged third phase of Operation Lockstep is particularly intriguing, predicting a divide between those who have taken the vaccine and those who have not, leading to anarchy from all sides. This phase emphasises the survival of the fittest and the spiritually prepared. It also suggests the release of a weaponised SARS/HIV/MERS virus (or a faked one to cover up the effects of the vaccine) and the inflation of Covid case numbers through various means, such as changing death certificates, double counting, and classifying all deaths as Covid-19.

It is essential to remember that these claims are not substantiated by mainstream or official sources. As always, it is crucial to critically evaluate information and seek out multiple perspectives before forming conclusions.

For those interested in adding to the discourse, comments on this article are encouraged. The goal of comments is to gain additional truth, provide additional information, clarify, validate, or offer worthy rebuttal.

[1] For those interested in learning more about the original Rockefeller Foundation report, the document titled "Lockstep 2010" is available for reference.

  1. Articles discussing the allegations of a pre-planned pandemic response strategy named "Rockefeller Playbook: Operation Lockstep" are predominantly found in alternative or conspiracy-leaning narratives, instead of being recognized as legitimate by mainstream public health authorities.
  2. The concept of Operation Lockstep, as outlined in the 2010 Rockefeller Foundation scenario planning report named "Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development," imagines a strict, top-down approach to pandemics, including nationwide lockdowns, heavy surveillance, and suppression of dissent.
  3. It is highly important to approach claims about Operation Lockstep, particularly those suggesting prior planning of draconian state control measures, with skepticism, as they are not supported by concrete evidence from mainstream or official sources.

Read also:

    Latest