Skip to content

Each test chemical will undergo multiple repetitions of the testing process.

Sun-wary individuals rely on sunscreens with Sun Protection Factors of 50 or higher to shield themselves from sunburn and skin cancer. Yet, the product labels' claims may not always be trustworthy.

Emphasize Sun Protection: Wear Sunscreens with SPF 50 or Higher for Prevention of Sunburn and Skin...
Emphasize Sun Protection: Wear Sunscreens with SPF 50 or Higher for Prevention of Sunburn and Skin Cancer

Each test chemical will undergo multiple repetitions of the testing process.

In Frankfurt, a recent study by "Öko-Test" magazine reveals inconsistencies between the sun protection factor (SPF) claimed on sunscreen labels and their actual efficiency. For the first time, the research was conducted using a new test standard that avoids exposure to potential skin damage by not requiring direct application on human skin.

Out of 26 high or very high SPF sunscreens tested, 15 met the declared protection factor standards outlined by "Öko-Test." One product even exceeded its declared SPF. However, 11 products fell short, with 10 offering less than three-quarters of the promised SPF. One product did not even reach a third, undershooting the SPF 20 mark.

Ten suspect sunscreens also contained the banned softener DnHexP, which may impact fertility. DnHexP can be a byproduct of the UV filter DHHB's production, but it's not always the case. Remarkably, nine sunscreens that contain DHHB were tested to be free of the softener.

Furthermore, DnHexP was detected in trace amounts in four sunscreens, which did not result in a downgrade in the rating, while one cream contained the softener in an amount that resulted in an "insufficient" grade. The reported DnHexP levels did not pose an immediate health risk, according to "Öko-Test."

Twelve sunscreens received a "good" rating, with two top-performing products rated "very good." Surprisingly, both the test winners were affordable, with prices of €3.57 and €3.18 per 200 milliliters, respectively. The winning sunscreens were:

  • "Sun D'Or Sonnenmilch, 50" by Budni or Edeka
  • "Sundance Sonnenmilch, 50" by Dm

While details about specific underperforming sunscreen products were not available, consumers are urged to exercise caution when choosing sunscreens. A reliable and safe option is recommended to effectively protect against harmful UV rays.

In light of the recent study, it's notable that the health-and-wellness practice of nutrition involves more than just sunscreen protection. For instance, consuming foods rich in antioxidants can assist in maintaining overall skin health and reduce the signs of sun damage.

Additionally, while science has helped develop sunscreens with high SPF ratings, it's equally important to be aware of potential harmful chemicals like DnHexP. This chemical, even if found in trace amounts, may impact health-and-wellness aspects such as fertility, demonstrating the need for careful sunscreen selection for optimal health benefits.

Read also:

    Latest