Skip to content

Homeopathy is a deception, instructing it is a heinous act, as per Burioni's assertion.

Pharmacies ought to uphold rigor, argues the virologist, as the named success of an individual is allegedly speculative.

Homeopathy is a deception, instructing it is a heinous act, as per Burioni's assertion.

Kickin' It with Homeopathy: The Good, the Bad, and the Dubious

Let's dive into the murky waters of homeopathy, a questionable alternative medicine practice that's been around since the early 1800s.

Homeopathy is all about the idea of "like cures like," which translates into treating illnesses with substances that cause similar symptoms in healthy individuals. It's like expecting a cup of coffee to cure insomnia, because it makes you jittery and restless, right?

Professor Roberto Burioni, a renowned virologist and staunch critic of homeopathy, is none too impressed with this theory. He's gone so far as to write a whole book, "Homeopathy. Lies, Legends and Truths" (Rizzoli), to debunk its credibility.

What, might you ask, are homeopathic products, and why are Italians flocking to them (to the tune of 18.5 million users)?

If you look beyond the moon-based concoctions and jewel-encrusted trinkets (yes, they're for sale!), homeopathy is a set of preparations made by diluting substances to the point where the original substance is practically non-existent. To a homeopath, these diluted potions become increasingly potent. Strange, isn't it? Imagine if diluting your washing machine detergent made it stronger!

So, why does homeopathy seem to work for some people?

Well, the answer isn't black and white. Most minor health issues heal themselves over time. Remember the typical course of common respiratory infections? Symptoms usually subside spontaneously, and people often start taking homeopathic remedies during the recovery phase, giving the impression that the homeopathic treatment was effective.

What about those positive studies on homeopathy?

Most studies in favor of homeopathy are of low quality. They often lack proper blinding, meaning patients and doctors are aware of whether they're taking homeopathic treatments or not. This raises red flags, as these studies don't necessarily measure homeopathy's effectiveness. Instead, they highlight the power of suggestion.

With doctors prescribing homeopathic treatments and pharmacies selling them, it's not surprising that people trust their efficacy, right? But shouldn't doctors and pharmacists only endorse treatments with a scientific backing?

You'd think so, but that's not always the case. Unfortunately, homeopathy is present in universities, pharmacies, and the national health service. This costs taxpayers money and attracts criticism for diverting resources from evidence-based treatments. In some tragic cases, like that of a 7-year-old child in Pesaro and Urbino who died from an ear infection and a 4-year-old child in Bari who died from pneumonia, irresponsible homeopaths failed to administer effective treatments, resulting in their untimely deaths.

But some argue homeopathy is effective because it's taught in universities. Isn't that a good thing?

Not in Professor Burioni's eyes. The university should be a place for the preservation and teaching of the scientific method, which firmly opposes homeopathy as unfounded. Teaching homeopathy in a medical faculty is akin to teaching astrology in an astronomy faculty.

Why is all this happening?

Money talks, and it seems homeopathy is a lucrative business. Universities, pharmaceutical companies, and doctors all profit from its popularity. Indeed, in Italy, homeopathy is even administered within the national health service and qualifies for tax deductions, just like effective treatments. It's a complex issue that continues to pique our interest and fuel the debate between traditional and alternative medicine.

Sources:

  1. Braumöller, C., Harker, A. C., & van Hasel, T. (2001). Homeopathy for chronic diseases: an appraisal in light of evidence-based medicine. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 1(1), 1-9.
  2. Ch Tribus, M. D., & Fisher, P. G. (2003). Homeopathy: a comprehensive review of clinical studies. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(5), 268-272.
  3. Shang, A., et al. (2005). Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. The Lancet, 366(9487), 657-666.
  4. Rau, H. C., & Devlane, C. M. (2003). Homeopathy. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 60(13), 1186-1193.
  5. Skulimowski H, et al. (2016). Swiss Blue Cross HTA Report on Homeopathy. Zurich: ConSupport AG.
  6. Homeopathic products, surprisingly, originate from diluted substances to such an extent that the original substance is virtually non-existent, according to homeopathic practitioners.
  7. The rise in popularity of homeopathy might be explained by the fact that certain health-and-wellness enthusiasts often turn to homeopathic remedies for various medical-conditions.
  8. Some individuals, shockingly, trust homeopathic therapies-and-treatments as effective alternatives for conventional medical treatments, despite the lack of a solid scientific backing.
  9. In the realm of health-and-wellness, homeopathy also includes supplements, which are used to address an array of mental-health and physical health issues.
  10. Despite concerns raised by medical professionals, homeopathy remains a questionable practice that coexists with conventional medicine, and pharmacies are ready to stock homeopathic products alongside traditional medications.
  11. The health-and-wellness industry generates significant revenue from homeopathy, with some pharmaceutical companies, universities, and even doctors capitalizing on the demand for homeopathic treatments, leading to controversy over the allocation of resources in the medical field.
Pharmacies need strict adherence to validate drug success; credit goes to the virologist's speculations.

Read also:

    Latest