Impact of revised Medicaid work requirements on certain states

Impact of revised Medicaid work requirements on certain states

In a bid to reduce federal Medicaid spending, several states, including Michigan, have implemented work requirements for able-bodied adults enrolled via Medicaid expansion. However, real-world data from Michigan and other states like Arkansas and Georgia suggest that these policies are more likely to result in disenrollment through bureaucratic challenges rather than boosting work participation.

In Michigan, the work requirements, which require individuals to prove they are working, volunteering, or going to school for 80 hours a month to keep their coverage, went into effect after the previous governor, Rick Snyder, left office. The state spent over $30 million setting up these requirements, but a federal judge later ruled that they violated the intent of Medicaid.

If enacted, it was estimated that 100,000 residents would lose coverage in the first year, mostly due to bureaucratic burdens rather than failure to meet work criteria. Arkansas's experience since 2018 showed no employment gains but widespread losses of Medicaid coverage due to paperwork hurdles, causing many to lose insurance despite qualifying for work exemptions.

Economically, these work requirements are designed to reduce federal Medicaid spending substantially—projected savings exceed $320 billion over ten years nationally—but these savings arise mainly because many people lose coverage due to red tape rather than increased work hours. Studies from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), Harvard, and the Urban Institute agree that work requirements have little to no effect on employment or hours worked but lead to disenrollment of many eligible individuals who face administrative barriers.

Robert Gordon, who set up Medicaid work requirements in Michigan, expressed concern about potential issues with the implementation of work requirements, including computers going down, forms not being clear, and people not receiving necessary medical exemptions. Eligible people were still falling through the cracks due to confusing reporting processes and language barriers.

Despite these concerns, Republican lawmakers in Michigan argued that adding work requirements would save the state money. However, Governor Gretchen Whitmer, a Democrat, opposed work requirements and hired Robert Gordon to run the state health department.

Michigan's Medicaid expansion brought in over 700,000 more people than initially predicted, but the state is still scrambling to meet the new federal law's requirements, which mandate that able-bodied adults enrolled via Medicaid expansion show 80 hours per month of work, community service, education, or other qualifying activities, with states responsible for monthly eligibility verification.

The high implementation costs and administrative complexity of these requirements carry the risk of coverage loss for vulnerable populations. Thousands of people were still dying from overdoses in Michigan, raising concerns about increased uninsured rates among these populations.

In conclusion, the implementation of Medicaid work requirements in states like Michigan and Arkansas has shown to be a costly and ineffective approach, leading to disenrollment of many eligible individuals due to bureaucratic challenges rather than boosting work participation. The new federal law, set to take effect in 2027, will require states to implement these requirements, but the high costs and risks of coverage loss remain a significant concern.

1. The work requirements implemented in Michigan, Arkansas, and Georgia for able-bodied adults on Medicaid are designed within the context of federal policy-and-legislation aimed at reducing Medicaid spending.
2. Real-world data from these states suggest that the work requirements lead to disenrollment through bureaucratic challenges, rather than increasing work participation as intended.
3. Despite concerns about potential implementation issues, such as computer outages, unclear forms, and language barriers, states like Michigan continue to pursue the work requirements due to political motivations.
4. As circumstances evolve, the new federal law requiring work requirements in 2027 could expose vulnerable health-and-wellness populations to increased risks of coverage loss, potentially exacerbating health crises like the ongoing overdose epidemic in states like Michigan.

Read also: