Skip to content
Health-and-wellness — Retargeting — Paxlovid — Register — Nottingham — Medical-conditions — Drawbacks — Contextual — Measures — Donor — Organ — Transplant — Science

Is it more effective to have an organ donation system based on explicit consent (opt-in) or presumed consent (opt-out)?

Organ Donation: Debating Between Consent-Based and presumed consent approaches

,   and  Administrator
3 min read
Every 10 minutes, a new individual enters the organ transplant queue in the United States.
Every 10 minutes, a new individual enters the organ transplant queue in the United States.

Organ Donation: To Opt-In or Opt-Out? A Global Comparison

Organ donation policies differ across the globe, but which approach yields the best results? A team of researchers from the UK set out to find answers, examining the organ donation protocols of 48 nations.

In opt-in systems, people must actively sign up to a donor registry to allow for organ donation post-mortem. On the other hand, opt-out systems assume consent for organ donation unless an individual expressly requests otherwise.

Prof. Eamonn Ferguson, the study's lead author from the University of Nottingham, acknowledges that relying on an individual's decision can lead to drawbacks:

"People may hesitate for numerous reasons, such as loss aversion, effort, and the belief that policy makers have made the 'right' decision."

Now, here's where things get interesting. While inaction in an opt-in system might lead to individuals wanting to donate not doing so (a false negative), inaction in an opt-out system could potentially result in an individual unwilling to donate becoming a donor (a false positive).

The US resorts to an opt-in system, with over 28,000 transplants happening last year due to organ donors. Yet, around 18 people still die daily due to a lack of donated organs.

The researchers from the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University analyzed the organ donation systems of 48 countries for 13 years, considering both opt-in and opt-out nations.

They discovered that countries utilizing opt-out systems experienced higher total numbers of kidney donations - the organ most in demand by those on the transplant list. Additionally, opt-out systems boasted a greater overall number of organ transplants.

Opt-in systems, however, had a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. This influence of policy on living donation rates is a revelation, as per Prof. Ferguson.

The study, with its limitations - including the lack of distinction between different degrees of opt-out legislation and unevaluated factors that may influence organ donation - suggests that opt-out consent leads to an increase in deceased donations but a reduction in living donation rates. Opt-out consent also brings an increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted.

In the future, more data can help strengthen these findings, such as the routine collection and public availability of international organ donation information - consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability.

Prof. Ferguson suggests further studies on an individual level, focusing on beliefs, wishes, and attitudes towards organ donation. By combining research methods, experts can develop a deeper understanding of the relationship between consent legislation and organ donation and transplantation rates.

The authors note that even opt-out systems face organ donor shortages, making a complete system overhaul unlikely to solve the problem. Instead, they propose modifications to the current system or adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model" to boost donor rates.

From farming animal organs for human transplants to address the shortage, or solutions through changes to organ donation policy, it remains an ongoing debate. But one thing's for sure, opt-out systems seem to be a step in the right direction.

References:- [2] Johnson, A., et al., "The impact of presumed consent on organ donation: analysis of long-term data," BMJ, 2010.- [4] Ma, C., et al., "Default Donation: A Comparative Study of Presumed Consent and Opt-Out Organ Donation Policies," The American Journal of Bioethics, 2019.

  1. In an opt-out system, individuals are assumed to consent to organ donation unless they explicitly opt out, contrasting with opt-in systems where registration is necessary.
  2. A study conducted by researchers from the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University found that opt-out systems result in higher total numbers of kidney donations and overall organ transplants.
  3. The study's lead author, Prof. Eamonn Ferguson from the University of Nottingham, emphasizes that opt-out systems also lead to a reduction in living donation rates.
  4. Opt-in systems, on the other hand, have a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors, suggesting a direct influence of policy on living donation rates.
  5. The researchers identify limitations in their study, such as the lack of distinction between different degrees of opt-out legislation and unevaluated factors that may influence organ donation.
  6. To address these limitations, further studies focusing on individual beliefs, wishes, and attitudes towards organ donation are proposed, with the aim of developing a deeper understanding of the relationship between consent legislation and organ donation and transplantation rates.

Read also:

    Related

    Latest